Big brained wild animals at greater risk of extinction?

  • by
Barbary macaque

Wild animals with bigger brains may be at greater risk of extinction according to a study led by Manuela Gonzales-Suarez of the University of Reading. She said: “We found bigger brains may actually hold mammals back from becoming the most abundant organisms in an area. This may be because bigger brains require more food and other resources, and therefore more space, to sustain them.”

Barbary macaque

Barbary macaque. Image by 9883074 from Pixabay

Comment: it is known that although the brain make up 2% of the human body it burns 20% of the energy consumed. In other words the brain compared to other aspects of animal anatomy takes more energy to run it. The same can be said of animals. As the bigger brain burns more energy the wild animal needs more space in order to find the resources to provide the sustenance and the energy required to feed the brain.

An example provided by the researchers is the Barbary macaque. It is a monkey found in Gibraltar and their brain weighs 95 g. The average population size of this primate is thirty-six individuals per square kilometre. This is three times the area of the siamang, a gibbon species with the same weight and diet but a larger brain at 123 g. This primate has an average population density of fourteen individuals per square kilometre.

Prof Gonzales-Suarez said that the finding is important for conservation because when a species lives in low densities across their distribution they are more likely to become extinct. The exception is the human who has used his intelligence to find ways to improve food production and overcome resource limitations. Although, I have recently written an article about the maximum human population that the planet can sustain. This article focuses on the space required to farm livestock and soya which is leading to deforestation which in turn dramatically harms the planet and the conservation of animal species.

It fits in nicely with this study because you would have to disagree with the professor as humans are not doing such a great job of finding sustainable methods to feed themselves. It is an act of self-destruction in the longterm.

SOME MORE ON APES:

Chimpanzee with grass ear decoration

Do non-human animals have culture?

Unquestionably, non-human animals do, indeed, have culture. It is another example of an erosion of the concept of human exceptionalism ...
Read More
Bonobo Marie and her adopted daughter Flora

Animals adopting unrelated animals or animals of another species

We know that humans adopt children through adoption services because their parents are unable to look after their own children ...
Read More
Gorilla San Diego Zoo

Gorillas should be given a Covid-19 vaccination

Zoo gorillas should be given the Covid-19 vaccination because scientists have discovered that captive gorillas at a zoo in California ...
Read More
Kanit Sermsirimongkol. He refuses to release the female gorilla he has caged up for 30 years at his private zoo in a department store

Cher wants to free gorilla caged for thirty years in a shopping mall

I can barely write about this because it is so cruel and when you write about cruel things you can ...
Read More
Gelada monkey

Female Ethiopian gelada monkey suppresses development to avoid sex with father

Female gelada monkeys of Ethiopian rapidly mature in the presence of an incoming breeding male. While the biological father of ...
Read More
Baboon

Baboons who are more strongly bonded live longer lives

A study published in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B tells us that strong social bonds extends ...
Read More